Hospital Factors Are More Important than Volume in Predicting Outcome and Failure to Rescue in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Robotic Lobectomy

Presented During:

Monday, May 8, 2023: 3:18PM - 3:21PM
Los Angeles Convention Center  
Posted Room Name: Exhibit Hall  

Abstract No:

P0141 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

J. W. Hayanga (1), Jason Lamb (1), Stuart Campbell (1), J. Hunter Mehaffey (1), Ghulam Abbas (1), Vinay Badhwar (1), Alper Toker (1)

Institutions:

(1) West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV

Submitting Author:

*J. W. Awori Hayanga    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University

Co-Author(s):

Jason Lamb    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University
Stuart Campbell    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University
J. Hunter Mehaffey    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University
Ghulam Abbas    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University
*Vinay Badhwar    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University
*Seyfi Toker    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University

Presenting Author:

*J. W. Awori Hayanga    -  Contact Me
West Virginia University

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand despite outcome variability between hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic lobectomy.

METHODS
Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients aged 65 and older with a diagnosis of lung cancer undergoing robotic upper lobectomy between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had a segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge and bronchoplastic resections, those with metastatic or non-malignant disease, and those with a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume (Low <9, Medium 9-20; High >20). We utilized the Medicare Mortality index (MMI), a marker of overall hospital performance, and analyzed hospitals by tertile (low <0.04; medium 0.04-0.13; high >0.13). Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness-of-fit.

RESULTS
Data pertaining to 4,317 patients who underwent robotic resection were analyzed. After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs. $30,316, p = 0.006) p < 0.001), as well as higher mortality (OR 7.46; 95% CI 2.67-28.2, p < 0.001) and death within 60 days (OR 17.1; 95% CI 5.43-87.4). Compared to high volume hospitals, low volume centers had the highest incidence of conversion to open, atelectasis, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic anemia, death, length of stay (LOS), and costs (each p<0.001). The C-statistic for volume as a predictor of FTR was 0.6. Hospitals in the highest tertile of MMI had highest incidence of conversion to open surgery (p=0.01), pneumothorax (p=0.02), atelectasis (p<0.001), and respiratory failure (p<0.001). They also had highest mortality, readmissions, LOS, costs (each p<0.001), and shortest survival (p<0.001). The C-statistic for MMI was 0.8. (Figure)

CONCLUSION
The MMI incorporates hospital-based factors in the adjudication of outcomes and may be a more sensitive predictor of FTR rates than volume alone. Combining MMI and volume may provide a metric that can guide quality improvement and cost effectiveness measures in hospitals seeking to implement robotic lung

Categories:

Lung Cancer

Image or Table

Supporting Image: FIGURESurvivalCurvesDisplayingTertilesofVolumeandMortalityIndex.png
 

Abstract Secondary Categories (optional)

Secondary Categories (optional) Select all that apply:

Procedural Techniques
Outcomes/Database
New Innovation

Keywords

Keywords - General Thoracic

Lung - Lung
Lung - Lung Cancer
Procedures - Procedures
Procedures - Minimally Invasive Procedures/Robotics
Procedures - Other Thoracic Procedures