Does the distal ascending aorta and arch grow following aortic root and ascending aorta replacement?

Presented During:

Thursday, April 25, 2024: 5:38PM - 7:00PM
Sheraton Times Square  
Posted Room Name: Central Park  

Abstract No:

P0108 

Submission Type:

Abstract Submission 

Authors:

Krishna Mani (1), Rajdeep Bilkhu (1), Frank Schroeder (1), Marjan Jahangiri (2)

Institutions:

(1) St. George's Hospital, London, NA, (2) St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Submitting Author:

Krishna Mani    -  Contact Me
St. George's Hospital

Co-Author(s):

Rajdeep Bilkhu    -  Contact Me
St. George's Hospital
Frank Schroeder    -  Contact Me
St. George's Hospital
*Marjan Jahangiri    -  Contact Me
St. George's Hospital

Presenting Author:

Krishna Mani    -  Contact Me
N/A

Abstract:

Does the distal ascending aorta and arch grow following aortic root and ascending aorta replacement?

Krishna Mani, Rajdeep Bilkhu, Frank Schroeder, Marjan Jahangiri
Objective: We aim to assess the growth of distal ascending aorta and arch following aortic root replacement (ARR) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) + ascending aorta replacement (AAR).
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 184 consecutive patients who underwent ARR and AVR+AAR, between 2016 and 2022 was carried out (significant reduced activity during COVID). Patients with dissection and arch surgery were excluded. All patients underwent pre-operative CT scanning and follow-up at 6 months, 1 year and then annually.

Results: Of 184 patients, 60 had bicuspid aortic valve. 121 (66%) had ARR and 63 (34%) had AAR + AVR. Mean age was 60, 70% were male. Median cross-clamp and bypass times were 80 (range, 31-169) and 97 (range, 40-180) minutes, respectively. There were 2 (1.1%) in-hospital deaths. 3 (1.6%) patients had transient ischemic attacks/strokes and 3 (1.6%) had resternotomy for bleeding. Median ICU and hospital stays were 2 and 8 days, respectively. Median follow-up was of 4.3 years (1-82 months). The preoperative median ascending aorta and aortic arch diameters were 48.2 (range, 23-99) mm and 32.2 (range, 23-99) mm, respectively. The latest follow-up diameters of the distal ascending aorta were 32.4 (range, 23-41) mm and arch of 30.8 (range, 20-54) mm, respectively. No patients required surgery to the residual aorta.
In the bicuspid aortic valve subgroup, 54 (90%) had ARR and 6 (10%) had AAR + AVR. Mean age was 56 years and 90% were male. There was 1 (1.7%) in-hospital death and 1 (1.7%) patient had a TIA/stroke. The preoperative ascending aorta and aortic arch diameters were 48.2 (range, 26-65) mm and 31.2 (range, 23-49) mm respectively. The latest follow-up diameters of the distal ascending aorta were 32 (range, 27-45) mm and arch of 29.3 (range, 23-43) mm.

Conclusion: Our data does not support the practice of prophylactic arch replacement in patients undergoing ARR and AAR. The remainder of the aorta doesn't seem to grow in non-syndromic patients at four years follow-up and therefore there may not be a need for prolonged surveillance.

Aortic Symposium:

Aortic Arch

 

Keywords - Adult

Aorta - Aorta
Aorta - Aortic Arch
Aorta - Aortic Root
Aorta - Ascending Aorta
Aortic Valve - Aortic Valve